⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

November 30, 2009Contemporary Security Policy

Strategic Culture and Tailored Deterrence: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice

Jeffrey S. Lantis

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Critics charge that American deterrence and counter-proliferation strategies failed to stem the tide of national security threats or hinder the spread of weapons of mass destruction over the past d...

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Jeffrey S. Lantis (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19269d990f10e0212658e7 https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260903326677

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Coercing to win in war—how to assess the prospects of success and can it work in Ukraine?Contemporary Security Policy · Wed,
2Palestine’s managed precarity: EU governance, the denial of democratic agency, and the foreclosure of resilienceContemporary Security Policy · Tue,
3Putin’s red lines lost in translation? Distinguishing credible threats from reflexive control in coercive bargainingContemporary Security Policy · Tue,
4Contesting control: Mechanisms of norm stagnation in the CCW debate on autonomous weapon systemsContemporary Security Policy · Sun,
5Reassessing coercion theory through the lens of the space domainContemporary Security Policy · Sun,

More from Contemporary Security Policy

Reclaiming the voice? Precarity and the quest for freedom in BelarusSat,
The politics of precarization in times of war and crisis: From paralysis to transformative resilienceThu,
The intelligence cyclone: How populism reshapes intelligence-policy relationsTue,
The quest for European autonomy and the risks of EU and NATO precarityWed,
When leaders rock the boat: Leader reputation and the credibility of US commitmentsMon,