Key result
Blood flow restricted interval exercise matches supramaximal exercise for vascular function with lower perceived exertion.
Why the study?
Childhood obesity raises adult cardiovascular disease risk, but the acute effects of high-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction versus supramaximal exercise on vascular function were uncharacterized.
Does high-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction improve vascular function compared to supramaximal high-intensity interval exercise in obese male adolescents?
RCT (n=10)
Randomly allocated into two groups (crossover design)
No
Does high-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction improve vascular function compared to supramaximal high-intensity interval exercise in obese male adolescents?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.05% vs 5.54%
p-value: p=>0.05
High-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction acutely improves vascular function similarly to supramaximal exercise in obese male adolescents, but with a lower rate of perceived exertion.
Offers lower-exertion HIIE-BFR as an alternative for acute vascular gains in obese male adolescents; extends BFR evidence to youth.
Study purpose. Obesity, a chronic metabolic disease is on the rise among children and adolescents and is a leading cause of mortality in adults worldwide. It is imperative to prevent obesity in children to lower the risk of adult obesity and cardiovascular diseases. Considering the effectiveness of exercise program, high-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction (HIIE-BFR) may have potential beneficial effects on the vascular functions of obese individuals. This study aimed to compare the acute effects of supramaximal high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE-SUPRA) and HIIE-BFR on the vascular function in obese adolescents. Materials and methods. The subjects were adolescent males aged 13 to 15. The crossover study was divided into two trials. The first trial was a pilot study involving five obese adolescent males whose heart rates were evaluated under four conditions of exercise: 1) HIIE-SUPRA at 170% (VO₂peak), 2) HIIE-BFR at 85% VO₂peak with 40% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP), 3) 60% AOP, and 4) 80% AOP. The second trial was conducted on ten obese adolescent males who performed HIIE-SUPRA and HIIE-BFR exercises separately, each for at least three days. Data collection was done to analyze the vascular function parameters before and after exercising (immediately, 10 min, 30 min, and 60 min after). Results. The results of the first trial showed that the mean heart rate of HIIE-BFR at 40% AOP was similar to that of HIIE-SUPRA (p>0.05). In the second trial, both types of exercises showed similar outcomes, with increased flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), while brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) decreased after exercise as compared to the baseline values (before exercise) (p<0.05). However, HIIE-BFR at 40% AOP demonstrated a lower rate of perceived exertion (RPE) as compared to HIIE-SUPRA (p<0.05). Conclusions. HIIE-BFR at 40% AOP was effective in regulating the RPE and acutely increasing the vascular function after exercise in obese adolescents, similar to HIIE-SUPRA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noikhammueang et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Obesity (n=10). High-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction (HIIE-BFR) vs. Supramaximal high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE-SUPRA) at 170% VO2peak was evaluated on Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) change immediately after exercise (p=>0.05). High-intensity interval exercise with blood flow restriction at 40% AOP acutely improved vascular function similarly to supramaximal exercise in obese male adolescents, but with a significantly lower rating of perceived exertion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: