Key result
High-intensity interval exercise resulted in greater total reactive hyperemia compared to moderate-intensity exercise immediately after (ES=0.67, P=0.03) and 1 hour after (ES=0.62, P=0.01) exercise.
Why the study?
Does high-intensity interval exercise improve acute vascular function compared to moderate-intensity exercise in adolescents?
RCT (n=20)
Counterbalanced order
Does high-intensity interval exercise improve acute vascular function compared to moderate-intensity exercise in adolescents?
Effect estimate: ES 0.67
p-value: p=0.03
High-intensity interval exercise provides superior acute macro- and microvascular benefits compared to moderate-intensity exercise in adolescents.
Acute HIIE may confer greater postprandial vascular protection than MIE in adolescents; leaves open whether intensity-specific regimens improve long-term outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Impairments in vascular function are present in asymptomatic youths with risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Exercise can promote vascular health in youth, but the effects of exercise intensity and the time course in response to acute exercise are unknown. METHODS: Twenty adolescents (10 male, 14.1 ± 0.3 yr) performed the following on separate days in a counterbalanced order: 1) cycling at 90% of the gas exchange threshold (moderate-intensity exercise (MIE)) and 2) 8 × 1-min cycling at 90% peak power with 75-s recovery (high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE)). The duration of MIE (25.8 ± 2.1 min) was work-matched to HIIE (23.0 min). Macro- and microvascular functions were assessed before, immediately after, and 1 and 2 h after exercise by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and laser Doppler imaging (total reactive hyperemia). RESULTS: FMD was attenuated immediately after HIIE (P < 0.001, effect size (ES) = 1.20) but not after MIE (P = 0.28, ES = 0.26). Compared with that before exercise, FMD was elevated 1 and 2 h after HIIE (P < 0.001, ES = 1.33; P < 0.001, ES = 1.36) but unchanged in MIE (P = 0.67, ES = 0.10; P = 0.72, ES = 0.08). Changes in FMD were unrelated to shear or baseline arterial diameter. Compared with that in preexercise, total reactive hyperemia was always greater after MIE (P < 0.02, ES > 0.60 for all) and HIIE (P < 0.001, ES > 1.18 for all). Total reactive hyperemia was greater in HIIE compared with that in MIE immediately after (P = 0.03, ES = 0.67) and 1 h after (P = 0.01, ES = 0.62) exercise, with a trend to be greater 2 h after (P = 0.06, ES = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Exercise intensity is positively associated with macro- and microvascular function 1 and 2 h after exercise. Performing HIIE may provide superior vascular benefits than MIE in adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bond et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Healthy adolescents (n=20). High-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) vs. Moderate-intensity exercise (MIE) cycling at 90% of the gas exchange threshold was evaluated on Macro- and microvascular functions assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and laser Doppler imaging (total reactive hyperemia) (ES 0.67, p=0.03). High-intensity interval exercise resulted in greater total reactive hyperemia compared to moderate-intensity exercise immediately after (ES=0.67, P=0.03) and 1 hour after (ES=0.62, P=0.01) exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: