Mixed methods research reveals significant gaps in employer branding versus employee experiences in India, suggesting need for alignment.
This research investigates the measurable divergence between the employer brand narratives projected by Indian companies on LinkedIn and the workplace realities experienced by their employees. A sequential mixed methods design was employed, comprising quantitative content analysis of 2,847 LinkedIn posts from ten leading Indian companies across the Information Technology and Fast-Moving Consumer Goods sectors, an employee survey (n = 387), and semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 18). An Employer Brand Gap (EBG) metric was computed by contrasting Brand Promise Intensity scores derived from LinkedIn content with actual employee experience ratings across five dimensions: Culture and Values, Career Growth, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI), Wellbeing and Work-Life Balance, and Compensation and Benefits. Findings confirm a statistically significant overall EBG (t = 14.82, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.82), with the most pronounced discrepancies in the DEI and Wellbeing dimensions. The IT sector exhibited a substantially larger gap than FMCG (IT EBG = 0.96 vs. FMCG EBG = 0.45). Mediation analysis established that psychological contract breach significantly mediates the relationship between the EBG and voluntary attrition intention (indirect effect = 0.21, 95% CI [0.14, 0.29]). The study contributes the Authentic Employer Branding Framework (AEBF) as a practical tool for HR practitioners seeking to align brand communication with verifiable workplace outcomes
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anushka Singh (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: