Examines coronary dilation reporting in Kawasaki disease, suggesting a need for guideline standardization.
This study examined the real-world impact of simultaneous dual Z-score reporting on the interpretation of coronary dilation in Kawasaki disease (KD). Two widely used reference systems exist for evaluating coronary artery dimensions in children: Boston Children's Hospital (Boston) and Pediatric Heart Network (PHN). We retrospectively reviewed KD echocardiograms performed at a single institution between January 2019 and November 2021; 47 KD patients were included. The PHN Z-scores for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) and left anterior descending (LAD) were larger than those of Boston, resulting in 15% of LAD and 13% of LMCA measurements classified as dilated by PHN but normal by Boston. Among discordant echocardiograms, cardiologists were evenly split on which system was cited, with 2 incomplete KD diagnoses confirmed solely on LAD dilation identified by PHN. Coronary normalization took a mean of 33 days by PHN vs 12 days by Boston. Simultaneous dual reporting introduces clinically meaningful discordance, warranting guideline standardization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holmes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: