Purpose: This paper aimed to identify dosimetric, clinical, and CT-based densitometric predictors of radiation-induced pulmonary events in breast cancer patients treated with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: A single-institution cohort of 1172 consecutive patients treated with 3D conformal whole-breast radiotherapy (40 Gy/15 fractions) before 2017 was analyzed. Ipsilateral lung DVHs and CT densitometry metrics were extracted. Clinical variables and cardiac calcification (CAC) scores (Agatston_score, CAC_volume, Max_HU_Heart) were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed; collinearity was assessed via Spearman correlation and VIF. Optimal thresholds were derived using the Youden index. Internal validation used bootstrap resampling. Results: After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 18 patients developed moderate/severe pulmonary events. The univariable analysis showed associations with lung densitometric features (median/mean HU, 10th percentile, the lung volume with HU < −850 (V850)), V37 Gy, lung volume, and CAC scores. Lower lung HU values and larger lung volumes were linked to higher risk. The best models combined V850 (or lung volume) with a CAC metric. The model including V850 > 175 cc and continuous Max_HU_Heart achieved an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.68, with good fit and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.33, R2 = 0.847). Conclusions: The baseline cardiopulmonary status, captured by lung and heart densitometry, predicts pulmonary toxicity better than dosimetry. V850 > 175 cc was associated with a 4-fold higher risk, consistent with air trapping, known as a marker of emphysema.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fois et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: