Key result
Real-time true FISP cine MR imaging evaluated the entire left ventricle in one breath hold, yielding higher myocardium-to-blood CNRs than FLASH and comparable LV function to single-section FISP.
Why the study?
Does real-time true FISP cine MR imaging in a single breath hold provide comparable left ventricular mass and function measurements to single-section true FISP and FLASH MR imaging?
Population
12 healthy volunteers and 8 patients with cardiac disease (n=20)
Comparison
Real-time true fast imaging with steady-state… vs Single-section true FISP imaging and segmented…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
May support single-breath-hold LV cine MRI clinically; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
Observational (n=20)
Does real-time true FISP cine MR imaging in a single breath hold provide comparable left ventricular mass and function measurements to single-section true FISP and FLASH MR imaging?
Real-time true FISP cine MR imaging allows for accurate evaluation of left ventricular function in a single breath hold, comparable to standard multi-breath-hold techniques.
Lee et al. (2002) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers and patients with cardiac disease (n=20). Real-time true FISP cine MR imaging vs. Single-section true FISP imaging and segmented FLASH MR imaging was evaluated on Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) and left ventricular mass and function measurements. Real-time true FISP cine MR imaging evaluated the entire left ventricle in one breath hold, yielding higher myocardium-to-blood CNRs than FLASH and comparable LV function to single-section FISP.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: