Why the study?
Does free-breathing 2D real-time SSFP MRI provide comparable left ventricular function measurements to standard multi-breath hold 2D-SSFP?
Does free-breathing 2D real-time SSFP MRI provide comparable left ventricular function measurements to standard multi-breath hold 2D-SSFP?
Free-breathing 2D real-time SSFP MRI provides comparable left ventricular function measurements to standard multi-breath hold imaging, though it requires more manual contour correction.
May support free-breathing real-time SSFP for LV assessment when breath-holding is limited; leaves open prospective validation in broader cohorts.
OBJECTIVE: Multi-breath hold cine-imaging (standard-2D-SSFP) is the standard technique for ventricular function assessment. However, image acquisition is time-consuming and breath holding is required. Ultrafast 2D real-time imaging (2D real time-SSFP) does not require breath holding, but spatial resolution is sacrificed. The accuracy of 2D real time-SSFP free-breathing ventricular function assessment by using an automated contour detection programme has not been systematically studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects (14 with impaired LV function) were investigated by 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular short-axis images were acquired with multi-breath hold standard 2D-SSFP and free-breathing 2D real time-SSFP. LV-volumes (EDV, ESV), EF, and mass were determined using a semi-automated contour detection programme. EDV, ESV, EF, and mass were not significantly different between real time- and standard 2D-SSFP in subjects (absolute differences: EDV 3.2 +/- 0.7 mL, ESV 3.0 +/- 0.3 mL, EF 1.9 +/- 0.4%, mass 0.8 +/- 0.4 g; P > or = 0.78) and patients (absolute differences: EDV= 3.0 +/- 0.8 mL, ESV 3.3 +/- 1.0 mL, EF 0.9 +/- 0.5%, mass 0.9 +/- 0.5 g; P > or = 0.73). Automated contour detection required extensive manual correction for real-time imaging (< or = 86%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in LV function measurements between real-time and standard 2D-SSFP are small, and not significant. Real-time SSFP may be used for rapid LV function assessment when examination time is limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sievers et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: