Key result
Free-breathing cine-GRICS cardiac MRI yielded similar volumetric parameters compared to a standard breath-held protocol, with differences of 3% ± 2.4 in the LV and 2.9% ± 4.4 in the RV.
Why the study?
Does free-breathing cardiac MRI using 2D cine-GRICS provide comparable assessment of cardiac function to standard breath-held protocols in human subjects?
Observational (n=6)
Does free-breathing cardiac MRI using 2D cine-GRICS provide comparable assessment of cardiac function to standard breath-held protocols in human subjects?
Free-breathing cine-GRICS MRI provides accurate assessment of cardiac volumes and function comparable to standard breath-held protocols, offering a motion-corrected alternative.
May enable free-breathing cardiac cine MRI; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
PURPOSE: To assess cardiac function by means of a novel free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A stack of ungated 2D steady-state free precession (SSFP) slices was acquired during free breathing and reconstructed as cardiac cine imaging based on the generalized reconstruction by inversion of coupled systems (GRICS). A motion-compensated sliding window approach allows reconstructing cine movies with most motion artifacts cancelled. The proposed reconstruction uses prior knowledge from respiratory belts and electrocardiogram recordings and features a piecewise linear model that relates the electrocardiogram signal to cardiac displacements. The free-breathing protocol was validated in six subjects against a standard breath-held protocol. RESULTS: Image sharpness, as assessed by the image gradient entropy, was comparable to that of breath-held images and significantly better than in uncorrected images. Volumetric parameters of cardiac function in the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) were similar, including end-systolic volumes, end-diastolic volumes and mass, stroke volumes, and ejection fractions (with differences of 3% ± 2.4 in the LV and 2.9% ± 4.4 in the RV). The duration of the free-breathing protocol was nearly the same as the breath-held protocol. CONCLUSION: Free-breathing cine-GRICS enables accurate assessment of volumetric parameters of cardiac function with efficient correction of motion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vuissoz et al. (2011) reported an observational. Free-breathing 2D cine-GRICS cardiac MRI vs. Standard breath-held protocol was evaluated on Volumetric parameters of cardiac function (LV and RV). Free-breathing cine-GRICS cardiac MRI yielded similar volumetric parameters compared to a standard breath-held protocol, with differences of 3% ± 2.4 in the LV and 2.9% ± 4.4 in the RV.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: