Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Neuroimaging study reveals that high confidence amplifies confirmatory evidence and abolishes disconfirmatory processing in humans, indicating that metacognition shapes entrenched beliefs.
A prominent source of polarised and entrenched beliefs is confirmation bias, where evidence against one's position is selectively disregarded. This effect is most starkly evident when opposing parties are highly confident in their decisions. Here we combine human magnetoencephalography (MEG) with behavioural and neural modelling to identify alterations in post-decisional processing that contribute to the phenomenon of confirmation bias. We show that holding high confidence in a decision leads to a striking modulation of post-decision neural processing, such that integration of confirmatory evidence is amplified while disconfirmatory evidence processing is abolished. We conclude that confidence shapes a selective neural gating for choice-consistent information, reducing the likelihood of changes of mind on the basis of new information. A central role for confidence in shaping the fidelity of evidence accumulation indicates that metacognitive interventions may help ameliorate this pervasive cognitive bias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rollwage et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: