Key result
White-coat effect in hypertensives is linked to ~70% more frequent immediate orthostatic hypotension.
Why the study?
The relationship between the white-coat effect, defined as white-coat hypertension under treatment, and the frequency of orthostatic hypotension was unknown.
Is the white-coat effect associated with an increased frequency of orthostatic hypotension in treated hypertensive patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=4,305)
Yes
Is the white-coat effect associated with an increased frequency of orthostatic hypotension in treated hypertensive patients?
Patients with a white-coat effect have a significantly higher frequency of orthostatic hypotension, highlighting the need to screen for OH to prevent excessive hypotension-related adverse events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
White-coat effect associated with orthostatic hypotension in treated hypertension; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before screening changes.
OBJECTIVE: The relationship between the white-coat effect (WCE), defined as white-coat hypertension under treatment, and the frequency of orthostatic hypotension (OH) is not known. We conducted an orthostatic test in patients with WCE to determine the frequency of OH. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 5631 patients with hypertension visiting general practitioners nationwide, in which 4305 patients with hypertension recorded their home blood pressure (BP) and consented to the orthostatic test. Patients with hypertension were divided into four groups: controlled hypertension (CHT), masked hypertension (MHT), sustained hypertension (SHT), and WCE. The orthostatic test was performed, and BP and pulse rate were measured immediately and 1 min after orthostasis. RESULTS: The OH frequencies immediately after standing in CHT, WCE, SHT, and MHT patients were 7, 11.7, 12.1, and 6.6%, respectively, and those at 1 min after standing were 7.1, 13.1, 11.6 and 6.9%, respectively (Chi-square test, P < 0.01, respectively). Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between WCE and the frequency of OH. The frequency of OH immediately after standing was significantly increased [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.702; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.246-2.326; P < 0.01]. The frequency of OH at 1 min after standing was also significantly higher (AOR, 1.897; 95% CI, 1.396-2.578; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: When the standing test was performed for patients with WCE, the frequency of OH increased. Thus, it is important to recognize the possibility of OH in patients with WCE to avoid adverse events associated with excessive hypotension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuasa et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=4,305). White-coat effect (WCE) vs. Controlled hypertension (CHT) was evaluated on Frequency of orthostatic hypotension (OH) immediately after standing (AOR 1.702, 95% CI 1.246-2.326, p=<0.01). The white-coat effect in hypertensive patients was associated with an increased frequency of orthostatic hypotension immediately after standing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: