Key result
Less flexible Multi-link 8 stent induces roughly double the neointimal thickness of flexible Kaname stent.
Why the study?
Stent flexibility influences clinical outcomes in bifurcations, where overly rigid stents can impose mechanical stress and alter arterial geometry and hemodynamics.
Does stent flexibility influence vessel geometry, wall shear stress, and neointimal hyperplasia in coronary artery bifurcations?
Does stent flexibility influence vessel geometry, wall shear stress, and neointimal hyperplasia in coronary artery bifurcations?
In a swine model of coronary bifurcation lesions, a less flexible stent caused greater vessel straightening and expanded regions of low wall shear stress, leading to increased neointimal hyperplasia compared to a more flexible stent.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stent flexibility may influence neointimal hyperplasia in bifurcations; hypothesis-generating and requires human trials before practice change.
Purpose: Stent flexibility can influence clinical outcome, especially in bifurcation lesions. For instance, an overly rigid stent can impose mechanical stress on the artery at the stent edges and alter both arterial geometry and blood flow dynamics in bifurcations. This study investigated the influence of stent flexibility on vessel geometry, histology, wall stress, and blood flow dynamics in arterial bifurcations. Materials and Methods: We compared arterial angulation, stenosis, histopathology, simulated wall shear stress (WSS), and simulated blood flow velocity distribution in swine coronary artery bifurcations following placement of the less flexible Multi-link 8 or more flexible Kaname stent (4.1 ± 0.5 vs 1.5 ± 0.1 mN, p < 0.05, t -test). Stents were implanted into six coronary artery bifurcations each using the single-stent crossover technique without side branch strut dilatation. Outcomes were examined after 28 days. Results: Implantation of both stents significantly increased site angulation (Multi-link 8: 148° ± 8° to 172° ± 2°, p < 0.05, paired t -test; Kaname: 152° ± 5° to 164° ± 4°, p < 0.05, paired t -test), but the change tended to be greater after Multi-link 8 stent implantation (24° ± 15° vs 11° ± 7°, p = 0.1, t -test), suggesting greater straightening of the bifurcation. The Multi-link 8 stent induced greater neointimal thickness than the Kaname stent (0.53 ± 0.3 mm vs 0.26 ± 0.1 mm, p < 0.05, t -test). The distribution of neointimal hyperplasia following stent implantation as revealed by longitudinal histopathology matched the distribution of WSS simulated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The endothelium at low WSS areas exhibited aberrant cell morphology and leukocyte adhesion. A CFD model of a curved bifurcation suggested that the region of low WSS is expanded by artery straightening. Conclusion: In bifurcated lesions, stent flexibility influences not only mechanical stress on the artery but also WSS, which may induce local neointimal hyperplasia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2020) studied Coronary artery bifurcations (n=6). Multi-link 8 stent vs. Kaname stent was evaluated on Neointimal thickness (p=<0.05). The less flexible Multi-link 8 stent induced significantly greater neointimal thickness compared to the more flexible Kaname stent (0.53 mm vs 0.26 mm) in swine coronary bifurcations.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: