Key result
Narrower strut spacing and increased luminal protrusion led to larger areas of adverse low wall shear stress and high wall shear stress gradient in idealized stented coronary arteries.
Why the study?
Does stent design (strut spacing, thickness, protrusion) impact hemodynamic parameters (WSS, TAWSS, WSSG) in idealized coronary arteries?
Does stent design (strut spacing, thickness, protrusion) impact hemodynamic parameters (WSS, TAWSS, WSSG) in idealized coronary arteries?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adverse hemodynamic effects of specific stent design features like strut size and narrow spacing can be mitigated by other beneficial features, but increased luminal protrusion significantly worsens the hemodynamic profile.
Stent induced hemodynamic changes in the coronary arteries are associated with higher risk of adverse clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of stent design on wall shear stress (WSS), time average WSS, and WSS gradient (WSSG), in idealized stent geometries using computational fluid dynamics. Strut spacing, thickness, luminal protrusion, and malapposition were systematically investigated and a comparison made between two commercially available stents (Omega and Biomatrix). Narrower strut spacing led to larger areas of adverse low WSS and high WSSG but these effects were mitigated when strut size was reduced, particularly for WSSG. Local hemodynamics worsened with luminal protrusion of the stent and with stent malapposition, adverse high WSS and WSSG were identified around peak flow and throughout the cardiac cycle respectively. For the Biomatrix stent, the adverse effect of thicker struts was mitigated by greater strut spacing, radial cell offset and flow-aligned struts. In conclusion, adverse hemodynamic effects of specific design features (such as strut size and narrow spacing) can be mitigated when combined with other hemodynamically beneficial design features but increased luminal protrusion can worsen the stent's hemodynamic profile significantly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beier et al. (2015) studied Coronary artery disease (n=101). Stent design variations (strut spacing, thickness, luminal protrusion) vs. Alternative stent designs (Omega vs Biomatrix) was evaluated on Wall shear stress (WSS), time average WSS (TAWSS), and WSS gradient (WSSG). Narrower strut spacing and increased luminal protrusion led to larger areas of adverse low wall shear stress and high wall shear stress gradient in idealized stented coronary arteries.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: