Listening research has not gained legitimacy as a field of study in communication primarily due to the lack of testable theories. Listening research is a challenge, as listening is performed cognitively and perceived behaviorally, but listening cognitions and behaviors are not always congruent (Witkin, 1990 Witkin , B. R. ( 1990 ). Listening theory and research: The state of the art . Journal of the International Listening Association , 4 , 7 – 32 .[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]). Listening researchers have focused on the observable listening behaviors; however, results from these studies are not reliable due to the incongruency in cognitions and behaviors. Other listening studies have used verbal recall as a listening indicator; however, verbal recall often is undistinguishable from memory. Further, these studies have taken place in a linear context, so they would not be appropriate for use in conversational listening studies. The first step to developing listening theory is to create an instrument that produces a reliable measure of the cognitive listening process. This study (N = 360), grounded in cognitive psychology's working memory (WM) and capacity theories, demonstrates that the Conversational Listening Span (CLS) instrument can provide a valid measure of one's conversational listening capacity. The CLS represents the first step in building a listening model that is grounded in empirically supported research. This model, with measurable elements, can serve as the foundation for testable listening theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laura A. Janusik (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: