Key result
Coronary artery calcium score demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.816 for predicting unrecognized myocardial infarction, superior to the Framingham risk score and ASCVD risk score in asymptomatic Asian subjects.
Why the study?
Does coronary artery calcium score accurately predict unrecognized myocardial infarction detected on CMR in asymptomatic Asian subjects?
Observational (n=872)
No
Does coronary artery calcium score accurately predict unrecognized myocardial infarction detected on CMR in asymptomatic Asian subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.816% vs 0.712%
p-value: p=<0.0001
In an asymptomatic Asian cohort, coronary artery calcium score was a superior discriminator for unrecognized myocardial infarction on CMR compared to traditional cardiovascular risk scores.
CAC may aid UMI detection in asymptomatic Asians; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) and cardiovascular risk prediction scores in asymptomatic Asian subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 872 asymptomatic subjects without prior cardiovascular event (male:female, 817:55; age, 53.88 ± 5.91) who underwent both CMR and CAC scoring CT were included. UMI were accessed and framingham risk score (FRS) and ASCVD (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) risk score by ACC/AHA were calculated. RESULTS: Late gadolinium enhancement indicating UMI was noted in 23 of 872 subjects (2.64%), but only three of them showed ECG abnormality (13.04%). Subjects with UMI showed higher CAC scores, FRS, and ASCVD scores than those without UMI (p < .001, p = .011 and p = .024, respectively). The prevalence of UMI differed significantly according to the CAC scores as follows: 1% in CAC = 0 (4/403), 1% in 1 ≤ CAC <100 (2/293), 6.1% in 100 ≤ CAC < 400 (7/114) and 14.5% in CAC ≥ 400 (9/62), respectively (p < .001). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis by using CAC score demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.816 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.780-0.848; p < .0001) for predicting UMI, which is superior to FRS [AUC, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.671-0.751; p = .009] and ASCVD risk score [AUC, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.648-0.729; p = .036]. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of UMI increases with increasing burden of CAC and FRS. CAC score is a good discriminator for UMI, superior to FRS and ASCVD score, in asymptomatic population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jae et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Asymptomatic without prior cardiovascular event (n=872). Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score vs. Framingham risk score (FRS) and ASCVD risk score was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) for predicting unrecognized myocardial infarction (95% CI 0.780-0.848, p=<0.0001). Coronary artery calcium score demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.816 for predicting unrecognized myocardial infarction, superior to the Framingham risk score and ASCVD risk score in asymptomatic Asian subjects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: