Key result
A heart failure model of care significantly reduced 90-day readmissions (immediate step-down -9.4%, P=0.001) and 30-day readmissions (step-down 7.8%, P=0.018) compared to pre-intervention care.
Why the study?
Variation in delivery of guideline-recommended care was identified at the institution, prompting a project to deliver best practice guidelines, reduce care variation, and maximize time patients spend well in the community.
Does a comprehensive heart failure model of care reduce readmissions in patients admitted with heart failure?
Observational (n=3,305)
No
Does a comprehensive heart failure model of care reduce readmissions in patients admitted with heart failure?
Implementation of a comprehensive heart failure model of care significantly reduced 30- and 90-day readmissions without increasing emergency department visits or mortality.
May support heart failure care models to curb readmissions; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of sustained benefit.
BACKGROUND: We identified variation in delivery of guideline recommended care at our institution, and undertook a project to design a heart failure (HF) model of care. AIM: To maximise time patients with HF spend well in the community by delivering best practice guidelines to reduce variation in care improving overall outcomes. METHODS: This quality improvement project focused on reducing variation in process measures of care. The HF model of care included electronic HF care bundles, a patient education pack with staff training on delivering HF patient education, referral of all HF patients to the Hospital Admissions Risk Program for phone call within 72 h, and a nurse-pharmacist early follow-up clinic. Outcomes were assessed using interrupted time series analyses. RESULTS: The pre-intervention group comprised 1585 patients, and post-intervention 1720 patients with a primary diagnosis of HF admitted under general cardiology and general medicine. Interrupted time series analysis indicated 30-day readmissions did not change in overall trend (-0.2% per month, P = 0.479) but a significant immediate step-down of 7.8% was seen (P = 0.018). For 90-day readmissions, a significant trend reduction over the time period was seen (-0.6% per month, P = 0.017) with a significant immediate step-down (-9.4%, P = 0.001). Emergency department representations, in-patient mortality and length of stay did not change significantly. Improvements in process measures were seen at audit. CONCLUSION: This model of care resulted in overall trends of reductions in 30- and 90-day readmissions, without increasing emergency department representations, mortality and length of stay. This model will be adapted as the electronic medical record is introduced at our institution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hopper et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=3,305). Heart failure model of care vs. Pre-intervention usual care was evaluated on 30-day readmissions (Step-down 7.8%, p=0.018). A heart failure model of care significantly reduced 90-day readmissions (immediate step-down -9.4%, P=0.001) and 30-day readmissions (step-down 7.8%, P=0.018) compared to pre-intervention care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: