Key result
AF catheter ablation shows similar recurrence rates in patients with versus without cancer.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding the efficacy and safety of AF ablation in patients with cancer.
Does atrial fibrillation ablation have similar efficacy and safety in patients with cancer compared to those without cancer?
Cohort (n=812)
Does atrial fibrillation ablation have similar efficacy and safety in patients with cancer compared to those without cancer?
Absolute Event Rate: 43.8% vs 51.1%
p-value: p=0.88
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer is feasible, showing comparable recurrence rates and safety profiles to non-cancer patients.
Supports ablation feasibility in selected AF patients with cancer; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Cancer has become significant comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of AF ablation, the first-line rhythm control strategy, in patients with cancer. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and risk of AF recurrence and safety endpoints in patients with cancer compared to the non-cancer group after ablation. METHODS: From August 2011 to December 2020, we consecutively enrolled cancer patients in the China-AF cohort. We used propensity score matching (1:3) to select the control group and assessed the risk of AF recurrence and adverse events after ablation in cancer patients using a multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk model. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients with cancer were enrolled and 21 of them were active cancer, with a median follow-up of 12.3 months. The cumulative incidence of AF recurrence was comparable between patients with and without cancer (43.8% vs. 51.1%; p = .88). No difference in the risk of AF recurrence, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality was observed after adjusting confounders. Active cancer was not associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence compared to the stable disease (SHR = 1.32; 95% CI 0.72-2.43; p = .46). Cancer was associated with a low risk of cardiovascular hospitalization (SHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36-0.81; p = .01). Subgroup analysis found that hematological malignancy was associated with a high risk of AF recurrence (SHR, 5.68; 95% CI, 3.00-10.8; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that catheter ablation could be feasible for rhythm control of AF patients with concomitant cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with concomitant cancer (n=812). Catheter ablation vs. Patients without cancer undergoing catheter ablation was evaluated on AF recurrence (p=0.88). Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant cancer showed a comparable cumulative incidence of AF recurrence to those without cancer (43.8% vs. 51.1%; p=0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: