Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article presents a systematic content analysis of three religious‐conservative and two pro‐secular newspapers in 1996–2004 in Turkey, and discusses some findings and their implications regarding elite values and democratization: considerable internal pluralism within both religious‐conservative and pro‐secular elites; general consensus on democracy but not on democratic norms' application to specific issues and groups other than one's own; a division of values on religion, secularism, and social pluralism; political value change in favor of liberal democracy but social conservatism among religious‐conservative elites; fragmentation and relative cynicism, but not necessarily authoritarianism, among pro‐secular elites; weak ideational change on the Kurdish issue. The article argues that the press plays a significant political role as a site where elite values change or are reproduced through discussion, deliberation, or silence. Values affect and are affected by political developments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murat Somer (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: