Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article uses the data from the 2003–2006 and 2007–2011 cycles of sub-national legislative elections in 55 regions of Russia to examine the patterns and scope of co-optation in the process of dominant party system building. The analysis examines three modes of co-optation: direct co-optation into the dominant party, United Russia; indirect co-optation via well-established political parties with limited electoral appeal; and mediated co-optation via new quasi-opposition parties sponsored by the authorities. Several properties of parties, including electoral potential, ideological rigidity, and organisational stability, are identified as factors that determine the modes of co-optation for different categories of politicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grigorii V. Golosov (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: