Why the study?
Does the PULSE-SMART smartphone app accurately discriminate between sinus rhythm, AF, PACs, and PVCs compared to EKG or telemetry in patients with arrhythmias?
Does the PULSE-SMART smartphone app accurately discriminate between sinus rhythm, AF, PACs, and PVCs compared to EKG or telemetry in patients with arrhythmias?
The PULSE-SMART smartphone application can accurately detect and discriminate atrial fibrillation, PACs, and PVCs from sinus rhythm using pulse recordings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports smartphone arrhythmia screening feasibility; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common and dangerous rhythm abnormality. Smartphones are increasingly used for mobile health applications by older patients at risk for AF and may be useful for AF screening. OBJECTIVES: To test whether an enhanced smartphone app for AF detection can discriminate between sinus rhythm (SR), AF, premature atrial contractions (PACs), and premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). METHODS: We analyzed two hundred and nineteen 2-minute pulse recordings from 121 participants with AF (n = 98), PACs (n = 15), or PVCs (n = 15) using an iPhone 4S. We obtained pulsatile time series recordings in 91 participants after successful cardioversion to sinus rhythm from preexisting AF. The PULSE-SMART app conducted pulse analysis using 3 methods (Root Mean Square of Successive RR Differences; Shannon Entropy; Poincare plot). We examined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of the app for AF, PAC, and PVC discrimination from sinus rhythm using the 12-lead EKG or 3-lead telemetry as the gold standard. We also administered a brief usability questionnaire to a subgroup (n = 65) of app users. RESULTS: The smartphone-based app demonstrated excellent sensitivity (0.970), specificity (0.935), and accuracy (0.951) for real-time identification of an irregular pulse during AF. The app also showed good accuracy for PAC (0.955) and PVC discrimination (0.960). The vast majority of surveyed app users (83%) reported that it was "useful" and "not complex" to use. CONCLUSION: A smartphone app can accurately discriminate pulse recordings during AF from sinus rhythm, PACs, and PVCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McManus et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: