Why the study?
Left ventricular thrombus is a well-recognized complication of myocardial infarction that affects patient outcomes and warrants screening.
Early left ventricular thrombus remains a frequent complication (11.7%) after STEMI despite primary PCI, and is strongly predicted by LAD-related infarct and severe LV systolic dysfunction.
Supports targeted LVT screening after STEMI in LAD infarcts with severe LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating for anticoagulation trials.
BackgroundLeft ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a well-recognized complication of myocardial infarction that affects patient outcomes and warrants screening.MethodsThis retrospective study included 308 consecutive patients who presented with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction and were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.ResultsEarly screening for LVT by echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance revealed the following: LVT (+) group (36 patients [11.7%]) and LVT (−) group (272 patients [88.3%]). The 2 powerful independent variables associated with LVT formation were left anterior descending–related infarct (odds ratio, 10.17; P < 0.0001) and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (odds ratio, 8.3; P = 0.0001). The lower the left ventricular ejection fraction, the higher the risk of LVT was. Multivessel coronary artery disease and the type of early invasive strategy (culprit lesion only vs complete revascularization) were not predictive of LVT. The impact of environment (i.e., hot climate, exercise) and dehydration on the risk of LVT formation is uncertain.ConclusionEarly LVT formation is a frequent complication in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction despite timely intervention. Its independent predictors are left anterior descending–related infarct and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, there was no significant difference between lesion-only culprits and complete revascularization in reducing the risk of LVT development. Further studies in larger numbers of patients are needed because of the uncertainties regarding the links between the biological effects of the environment and the risk of LVT formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaled et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: