Why the study?
Does the ESC/ESA-NCS classification predict 30-day MACE and mortality/MI in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery within 1 year after DES implantation?
Does the ESC/ESA-NCS classification predict 30-day MACE and mortality/MI in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery within 1 year after DES implantation?
The ESC/ESA-NCS classification effectively predicts 30-day MACE and mortality/MI in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery within 1 year of DES implantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ESC/ESA-NCS stratification post-DES; leaves open prospective validation before guiding perioperative decisions.
Aims: The current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology on non-cardiac surgery (ESC/ESA-NCS) divide surgical procedures into those associated with low risk (<1%), intermediate risk (1-5%), and high risk (>5%) of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Evaluating surgical risk might be particularly appropriate in patients with recent stent implantation, and thus we validated the ESC/ESA-NCS classification in patients undergoing NCS within 1 year after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods and results: By record-linking the Western Denmark Heart Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry, we identified 4046 patients, who underwent NCS between 1 and 12 months after DES implantation. Primary outcomes were MACE [cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI)] and a combined endpoint of mortality and MI within 30 days after surgery. Both MACE (low risk 0.6%, intermediate risk 1.2%, and high risk 3.4%) and the combined endpoint of mortality and MI (1.5%, 4.6%, and 14.9%) were associated with the ESC/ESA-NCS classification. As compared with low-risk surgery, the odds ratios (OR) for MACE were 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-4.1] for intermediate-risk surgery and 5.8 (95% CI 1.7-20.1) for high-risk surgery. For the combined endpoint of mortality and MI, the OR's were 3.1 (95% CI 2.1-4.7) for intermediate-risk surgery and 11.3 (95% CI 5.9-21.9) for high-risk surgery. Conclusion: The ESC/ESA-NCS classification is a valid tool to predict the risk of both MACE and the combined endpoint of mortality and MI for patients undergoing NCS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Norderud et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: