It is found that the passivation of both the Pb0 and Pb1 defects in (100)Si/SiO2 (grown at <750 °C) with molecular H2 may well be described by the same defect- H2 reaction-limited kinetic model applying to interfacial Pb defects in (111) Si/SiO2 grown at 850 °C. Yet, whereas Pb was typified by a single-valued activation energy Ea=1.66 eV, both Pb0 and Pb1 are found to exhibit a Gaussian spread σEa=0.15±0.03 eV around their respective mean Ea values, determined as 1.51 and 1.57±0.04 eV. Such a spread complies with previous electron spin resonance data on stress-induced structural variations within the Pb bath. All three interface defects thus passivate comparably.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. Stesmans (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: