Why the study?
Despite favorable safety, efficacy, and dosing profiles of NOACs compared to VKAs, adherence issues remain unsolved, motivating investigation into OAC adherence and factors associated with poor adherence after ischemic stroke in AF patients.
Nearly half of ischemic stroke survivors with atrial fibrillation report poor adherence to oral anticoagulation, which is driven by patient-specific factors rather than standard risk scores.
May inform adherence strategies in post-stroke AF; leaves open prospective evaluation of targeted interventions.
Background Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have superior safety and comparable efficacy profile compared to vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs), with more convenient dosing schemes. However, issues with adherence to the NOACs remain unsolved.Aims We sought to investigate the adherence to oral anticoagulation (OAC) and baseline factors associated with poor adherence after ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods We recruited hospitalised patients (2013–2019) from two prospective stroke registries in Larissa and Helsinki University Hospitals and invited survived patients to participate in a telephone interview. We assessed adherence with the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) and defined poor adherence as a score of over 17. In addition to demographics, individual comorbidities, and stroke features, we assessed the association of CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores with poor adherence.Results Among 396 patients (median age 75.0 years, interquartile range [IQR] 70–80; 57% men; median time from ischaemic stroke to interview 21 months [IQR 12–33]; median ARMS score 17 [IQR 17–19]), 56% of warfarin users and 44% of NOAC users reported poor adherence. In the multivariable regression model adjusted for site, sex, and age, poor adherence was independently associated with tertiary education, absence of heart failure, smoking history, use of VKA prior to index stroke, and prior ischaemic stroke. CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores were not associated with poor adherence.Conclusions Adherence was poor in half of AF patients who survived an ischaemic stroke. Independent patient-related factors, rather than composite scores, were associated with poor adherence in these patients.KEY MESSAGESAdherence was poor in half of the atrial fibrillation patients who survived an ischaemic stroke.Independent patient-related factors rather than composite scores were associated with poor adherence.The findings support the importance of recognising adherence support as a crucial part of holistic patient care recommended by recent AF guideline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiili et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: