Key result
Each 10% drop in DOAC adherence is linked to ~10% higher major event risk, exceeding VKAs.
Why the study?
Patients with AF are frequently nonadherent to OACs prescribed for stroke and systemic embolism prevention, warranting quantification of the relationship between OAC adherence and AF clinical outcomes.
Does decreased adherence to oral anticoagulants increase the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, and death in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and does this effect differ between DOACs and VKAs?
Cohort (n=34,946)
Does decreased adherence to oral anticoagulants increase the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, and death in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and does this effect differ between DOACs and VKAs?
Hazard Ratio: 1.103 (95% CI 1.075–1.13)
Small reductions in oral anticoagulant adherence significantly increase the risk of stroke and death in AF patients, with DOAC recipients being more vulnerable to nonadherence than VKA recipients.
Lower DOAC adherence was associated with higher SSE risk; extends adherence data but leaves causal effects open.
Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently nonadherent to oral anticoagulants (OACs) prescribed for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) prevention. We quantified the relationship between OAC adherence and AF clinical outcomes using methods not previously applied to this problem. Methods Retrospective observational cohort study of incident cases of AF from population-based administrative data over 23 years. The exposure of interest was proportion of days covered (PDC) during 90 days before an event or end of follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate time to first SSE and the composite of SSE, TIA, or death, and several secondary outcomes. Results 44,172 patients were included with median follow-up of 6.7 years. For DOACs, each 10% decrease in adherence was associated with a 14% increased hazard of SSE and 5% increased hazard of SSE, TIA, or death. For VKA the corresponding increase in SSE hazard was 3%. Receiving DOAC or VKA was associated with primary outcome hazard reduction across most the PDC spectrum. Differences between VKA and DOAC were statistically significant for all efficacy outcomes and at most adherence levels. Conclusions Even small reductions in OAC adherence in patients with AF were associated with significant increases in risk of stroke, with greater magnitudes for DOAC than VKA. DOAC recipients may be more vulnerable than VKA recipients to increased risk of stroke and death even with small reductions in adherence. The worsening efficacy outcomes associated with decreasing adherence occurred without the benefit of major bleeding reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safari et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=34,946). Oral anticoagulant adherence (proportion of days covered) vs. Higher adherence vs lower adherence was evaluated on Composite of stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death (per 10% absolute decrease in adherence for DOAC users) (10.3% increase in hazard, 95% CI 7.5-13.0). Each 10% absolute decrease in adherence to direct oral anticoagulants was associated with a 10.3% increase in the hazard of stroke, systemic embolism, TIA, or death, a significantly greater risk than observed with vitamin K antagonists.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: