Why the study?
Adherence to DOACs remains a concern among patients with non-valvular AF, prompting an assessment of adherence patterns and their association with ischemic stroke and systemic embolism.
Does high adherence to DOACs (PDC ≥80%) reduce the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does high adherence to DOACs (PDC ≥80%) reduce the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
High adherence to DOACs (PDC ≥80%) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation is associated with a 44% reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism compared to lower adherence.
Suboptimal DOAC adherence was associated with higher stroke/SE risk; supports adherence interventions in AF but leaves open causality and practice change.
Background Adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a concern among non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We aimed to assess patterns of adherence with DOACs and examine their association with ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE). Methods This retrospective cohort study includes all adult members of Clalit Health Services, the largest healthcare provider in Israel, with newly diagnosed non‐valvular AF between January 2014 and March 2019, who initiated DOACs within 90 days of AF diagnosis and used DOACs exclusively. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) over the first year of treatment, and high adherence was defined as PDC ≥80%. Regression models were used to identify predictors of high adherence to DOACs and to examine the association between adherence and stroke or SE. Results Overall 15,255 patients were included in this study. The proportion of highly adherent (PDC ≥80%) DOACs users was around 75% and decreased slightly over the years. On multivariable analyses, the likelihood of high adherence to DOACs increased with age and across higher socioeconomic classes, and was more likely among females, Jews, statins users, and patients with CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score ≥2. Risk of stroke and SE was lower among highly adherent DOACs users; adjusted HR 0.56 (95% CI, 0.45–0.71), compared to users with PDC <80%. Conclusions Adherence with DOACs is still sub‐optimal among non‐valvular AF patients, resulting in a higher risk of stroke and SE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arbel et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: