Why the study?
Does strain analysis on MR tagged imaging characterize focal myocardial damage compared to FDG PET and LGE in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis?
Does strain analysis on MR tagged imaging characterize focal myocardial damage compared to FDG PET and LGE in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis?
Strain analysis using MR tagged imaging can reveal focal myocardial damage in cardiac sarcoidosis segments that are positive for FDG or LGE.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strain may flag focal damage in cardiac sarcoidosis; leaves open incremental value over LGE and FDG.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to characterize focal myocardial damage of cardiac sarcoidosis by strain analysis and to compare it with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. METHODS: We reviewed 208 segments from 13 cardiac sarcoidosis patients and measured the circumferential strain (Ecc) and the strain change per second (Ecc rate). The mean Ecc and Ecc rate values were compared between the FDG(+) and FDG(-), and the LGE(+) and LGE(-) segments using Welch's t test. RESULTS: The peak and max Ecc rates were better in the LGE(-) segments than in the LGE(+) segments (-11.8 vs -8.9%, 40.5 vs 29.7%/s, both P < 0.001). The max Ecc rate was higher in the FDG(-) segments than in the FDG(+) segments (39.2 vs 31.7%/s, P < 0.001), but the peak Ecc did not differ between the FDG(+) and FDG(-) segments (-11.2 vs -10.1%, P = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Strain analysis could reveal focal myocardial damage in the FDG(+) or the LGE(+) segments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: