Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is more prevalent than persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA, emphasizing the need for sensitive diagnostic monitoring in this population.
Supports extended monitoring for paroxysmal AF in stroke/TIA; leaves open optimal strategies in observational data.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cause of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). More extensive diagnostic effort is required to detect paroxysmal AF (pxAF) than persistent AF (pAF); the prevalence of pxAF in stroke patients is unknown. We evaluated the prevalence of pAF and pxAF in ischemic stroke and TIA patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke/TIA were enrolled prospectively. We aimed to detect patients with a history of AF, with AF newly diagnosed in the emergency room (ER), or with newly diagnosed AF during a 3-month period following the event. Differences in the frequency of AF diagnosis with respect to the disposition of patients after ER work-up were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 692 patients were enrolled (male: 52.2%; ischemic stroke: 69.1%; TIA: 30.9%). A previously documented history of AF was present in 19.7% (pAF: 47.1%, pxAF: 52.9%). In 3.8% of patients, AF was newly diagnosed in the ER (pxAF: 61.5%) and in 5.2% during the 3-month follow-up period. The overall prevalence of AF was 28.6% (pxAF: 62.6%). Previously documented pxAF evaded diagnosis at ER presentation in 48.6%. The prevalence of AF increased with age (p < 0.001). Patients with pxAF were younger than those with pAF (p = 0.004) and more often female (p = 0.05). The presence of any AF was associated with higher initial NIHSS scores (p < 0.001) and higher modified Rankin scores after 3 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: pxAF occurs more often than pAF in stroke/TIA patients. As effective stroke prevention is available for AF, it is important to develop and evaluate sensitive methods for detecting pxAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rizos et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: