Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy induce cardiac electric remodeling and correlate with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with LBBB and QRS ≥120 ms?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy induce cardiac electric remodeling and correlate with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with LBBB and QRS ≥120 ms?
CRT induces reverse electric remodeling on unpaced ECG, which correlates with reverse structural remodeling and clinical improvement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electric remodeling post-CRT was associated with outcomes; extends observational correlations but leaves open causal validation in RCTs.
Aim: impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on cardiac electric remodeling and its clinical and echocardiographic correlation. Patients and Methods: 50 patients candidate for CRT were included and assessed before and 3 months after implantation by history taking, clinical examination, transthoracic echocardiogram, ECG and six minutes walk test. Results: 50 patients (35 males and 15 females, mean age 54.88±7.48 years) with implanted CRT. All patients were in sinus rhythm, QRS duration ≥120 ms and LBBB. There was clinical response to CRT as NYHA class improved p<0.001 and 6 min walk test p<0.001, electrocardiographic response where apart from RR interval, there were significant differences in QRSD, QT, QTc, QTd, and TPE between pre and post CRT measurements (P<0.001) and echocardiographic response as LV volume improved in 78%, EF in 14% and change (∆QRSD) significantly correlated with changes in NYHA, LVEDD, LVESD, and LVEF. (∆QTd) significantly correlated with change in NYHA but not with echocardiographic changes. But ( ∆TPE) significantly correlated with LVEDD, LVESD, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF but not with ∆NYHA. Area under the curve was 0.813 for ∆QRSD (p=0.005), 0.56 for ∆QT (p=0.56), 0.59 for ∆QTc (p=0.41), 0.823 for ∆QTd (p=0.004), and 0.8 for ∆TPE (p=0.007). ∆QTd of ≥-20 ms had highest sensitivity for predicting both clinical and Echocardiographic response, while ∆QRSD of ≥-20 ms had highest specificity. Conclusion: CRT induced reverse electric remodeling including depolarization and repolarization changes on unpaced ECG that was associated with reverse structural remodeling and clinical improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaimaa Mostafa (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: