Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in daily practice led to sustained improvements in mean LVEF from 22% at baseline to 39.7% at 2 years (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve long-term echocardiographic remodeling and survival in patients with advanced heart failure in daily practice?
Cohort (n=130)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve long-term echocardiographic remodeling and survival in patients with advanced heart failure in daily practice?
p-value: p=<0.01
In daily clinical practice, cardiac resynchronization therapy provides sustained echocardiographic reverse remodeling over 2 years, and early LVEF improvement predicts better long-term survival.
Supports real-world CRT use for remodeling in advanced HF; leaves open causal survival links pending randomized confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: Most data on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are from trials with highly selected patients, with limited long-term echocardiographic data. This study was performed to evaluate long-term echocardiographic remodeling after CRT in daily practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: A biventricular pacemaker was implanted in 130 patients with advanced heart failure who met the general accepted criteria for CRT or in heart failure patients with a conventional pacemaker indication. Two years echocardiographic follow-up was available. Mean age (73 years) was higher than in the randomized trials. Forty-one patients (32%) died during the 2 year follow-up period. Mortality was higher in males, in patients with increased NT-proBNP, renal dysfunction, or left atrial dilatation before implantation. Echocardiographic response (LVEF improvement of 5% or more) was documented in 69, 88, and 91% of the survivors, after 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Echocardiographic response after 3 months was associated with a significantly higher long-term survival (P = 0.04). Mean LVEF was 22% at baseline compared to 31.8, 38.3, and 39.7% after 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively (P < 0.01). Reverse remodeling (a reduction of LV end systolic volume of more than 10%) was observed in 70.7, 81.0, and 91.7% of the survivors after 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Long-term LV improvement was more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. CONCLUSION: LV reverse remodeling and beneficial echocardiographic changes were sustained during 2 years follow-up. A 5% or more increase in LVEF after 3 months was associated with a better long-term survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delnoy et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Advanced heart failure (n=130). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (biventricular pacemaker) was evaluated on Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 2 years (p=<0.01). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in daily practice led to sustained improvements in mean LVEF from 22% at baseline to 39.7% at 2 years (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: