Why the study?
Do CYP11B2 gene locus polymorphisms increase the risk of a raised aldosterone-to-renin ratio in hypertensive patients?
Do CYP11B2 gene locus polymorphisms increase the risk of a raised aldosterone-to-renin ratio in hypertensive patients?
Genetic variation at the CYP11B2 locus is associated with a raised aldosterone-to-renin ratio, suggesting a genetic component to aldosterone production and hyperaldosteronism in hypertension.
CYP11B2 variants were associated with raised ARR in hypertension; leaves open whether genotyping refines ARR interpretation or screening.
The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a marker of aldosterone activity in hypertension. We examined the relationship of the ARR to the distribution of two biallelic polymorphisms at the CYP11B2 gene locus. One polymorphism affects a putative steroidogenic factor-1 binding site (-344 T/C) in the 5'-regulatory region, whereas the other marker reflects replacement of the intron-2 from CYP11B2 with that from the neighboring gene encoding 11beta-hydroxylase (CYP11B1; wild-type/conversion). We studied consecutive referrals to the Tayside hypertension clinic in 1998. Because the specificity of ARR (pmol/liter/ng/ml/h) for hyperaldosteronism increases with its threshold, ARRs of at least 750 and 1000 were used. A total of 375 patients were assessed; 86.9% had complete data. There were significant excesses of steroidogenic factor-1 (T) (ARR >/= 750, 0.62 vs. 0.51, P = 0.014; ARR >/= 1000, 0.63 vs. 0.51, P = 0.039) and intron-2 (conversion) (ARR >/= 750, 0.49 vs. 0.41, P = 0.205; ARR >/= 1000, 0.54 vs. 0.41, P = 0.029) alleles in patients with a raised ARR. The odds ratio for a raised ARR was 2.27 [95% confidence interval, 1.01, 5.09; P < 0.05] comparing patients with a homozygous haplotype for these alleles with those without any such alleles, and this risk increased with age. This study supports the notion that there is a genetic component that regulates aldosterone production and that hyperaldosteronism might develop over time in susceptible individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: