This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Adolescents with a parental history of bipolar disorder (BD; High-Risk) are more likely to develop BD than those without such history (Low-Risk). Actigraphy studies in adults indicate that instability in sleep and rest-activity rhythms (RAR) may be associated with progression to BD. However, it remains unclear whether High-and Low-Risk adolescents are differentially affected by sleep/RAR instability and their impact on emerging mood symptoms. Methods: We recruited 50 adolescents unaffected by BD (mean age[SD]=15.97[1.31], 58% female) stratified into High-Risk (N=22) and Low-Risk (N=28) groups. All participants completed two weeks of Baseline actigraphy; a subset of 11 High-Risk participants then completed a two-week sleep Stabilization Manipulation at home. Depression and mania rating scales were collected at Baseline and post-Manipulation. Covariates included age, sex at birth, total tracking days, and ratio of weekday to weekend tracking days; false-discovery rate correction was applied. Results: At Baseline, sleep/RAR instability did not differ between High and Low-Risk groups (P-values>0.05). Among High-Risk participants only, greater sleep duration variability was linked to higher levels of depressive (β[95%CI]=0.012[0.006,0.018]) and mania (β[95%CI]=0.011[0.003,0.019]) symptoms, and lower Circadian Function Index (CFI; composite measure of circadian activity robustness) was linked to greater mania symptoms (β[95%CI]=-8.236[-12.525,-3.940]). The Stabilization protocol reduced variability in sleep duration (P<0.001), midsleep (P=0.005), and CFI (P=0.044) in High-Risk adolescents, and reduced subthreshold mania symptoms, but this did not survive multiple comparison correction. Conclusions: These findings highlight that sleep/RAR instability may have a stronger impact on mood in High-Risk adolescents but simple behavioral interventions stabilizing sleep and rhythms could buffer against BD risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: