Why the study?
Does 30-day outpatient autotriggered event monitoring detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke?
Does 30-day outpatient autotriggered event monitoring detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke?
30-day outpatient event monitoring detects new paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in approximately 11% of patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke, highlighting the utility of routine monitoring in this population.
Monitoring may identify PAF in cryptogenic stroke; hypothesis-generating without outcome data.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke may have undetected paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We established the Stroke and Monitoring for PAF in Real Time (SMART) Registry to determine the yield of 30-day outpatient PAF monitoring in cryptogenic ischemic stroke. METHODS: The SMART Registry was a 3-year, prospective multicenter registry of 239 patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke undergoing 30-day outpatient autotriggered PAF detection in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. RESULTS: In intention-to-monitor analysis, PAF was detected in 29 of 239 patients (12.1%; 95% CI, 8.6%-16.9%). After retrospective chart review was performed, a new diagnosis of PAF was confirmed in 26 of 236 patients (11.0%; 95% CI, 7.6%-15.7%). The majority of detected PAF events were asymptomatic; only 6 of 98 recorded PAF events (6.1%) were patient-triggered or associated with symptoms. Routine monitoring in this population should be strongly considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flint et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: