Why the study?
The role of long-axis and short-axis RA and RV measurements on non-ECG-gated thoracic CT angiography for identifying chamber enlargement needed assessment.
Does non-ECG-gated thoracic CT angiography accurately identify right atrial and right ventricular enlargement compared to ECG-gated CT angiography in patients undergoing thoracic CT?
Does non-ECG-gated thoracic CT angiography accurately identify right atrial and right ventricular enlargement compared to ECG-gated CT angiography in patients undergoing thoracic CT?
Non-ECG-gated thoracic CT angiography can accurately diagnose right atrial and right ventricular enlargement using simple linear measurements, providing a reliable alternative when ECG-gated imaging is unavailable.
Simple linear measurements on non-ECG-gated CT may identify RA/RV enlargement; leaves open prospective validation versus ECG-gated CTA.
Purpose To assess the role of long-axis (LA) and short-axis (SA) measurements of the right atrium (RA) and right ventricle (RV) at non–electrocardiographically (ECG) gated thoracic CT angiography for identification of RA enlargement and RV enlargement. Materials and Methods This study was a retrospective case review of 138 patients who underwent both non–ECG-gated CT angiography and ECG-gated CT angiography concurrently from November 2016 through November 2018. The SA and LA of the RA and RV were measured by two observers blinded to the ECG-gated CT angiography data. ECG-gated CT angiography–derived RA end-systolic and RV end-diastolic volumes were used as standard of reference to derive cutoff values for diagnosis of RA and RV enlargement. Results In this study, 138 patients were evaluated (70 men, 68 women; mean age, 70.0 years ± 18.4 [standard deviation]; mean body mass index, 29.3 kg/m2 ± 8.1). Of these patients, ECG-gated CT angiography revealed 36.2% had RA enhancement and 19.0% had RV enhancement. The best predictor of RA enhancement was the product of atrial LA and SA measurements, for which a threshold value of 3210 mm2 yielded a 94% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity (area under the curve [AUC], 0.92). A threshold of 55.5 mm for LA diameter had 86% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity in identifying RA enlargement. RV enlargement could be predicted if the SA diameter was greater than 48.5 mm (76.9% sensitivity and 64.9% specificity) and with a body surface area indexed value of 27.0 mm/m2 (92.3% sensitivity and 74.8% specificity [AUC, 0.87]). Conclusion RA and RV enlargement can be accurately diagnosed by using non–ECG-gated CT angiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuffer et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: