Why the study?
How does regional myocardial function assessed by cine MRI differ between normal subjects and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on the degree of hypertrophy?
How does regional myocardial function assessed by cine MRI differ between normal subjects and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on the degree of hypertrophy?
Cine MRI demonstrates that in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, regional myocardial contractile function inversely correlates with the degree of segmental hypertrophy.
May inform segmental HCM phenotyping on cine MRI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
To assess the regional myocardial function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), I examined the systolic wall thickening (%WT) and percent change of segmental wall area (%AR) using cine magnetic resonance imaging in 23 normal volunteers (G1) and 40 patients (G2) with HCM. Short axis images of the left ventricle were recorded at the base and the apex, and were divided into 5 segments, and % WT and %AR were measured for each segment. There were no significant differences in %WT and %AR among the segments in G1, while %WT of the posterior septum, posterior and lateral segments in the apex were higher than the corresponding segments of the base. Wall segments of G2 were classified into 3 groups according to end-diastolic wall thickness: G2a, 12mm; G2b, 12<15; G2c, >15. At each slice level, %WT and %AR were highest in G2a and lowest in G2c.These findings suggest that myocardial shortening in normal subjects is higher in the apex than in the base, and, in HCM, regional myocardial function decreases in association with an advance of hypertrophy, with a possible compensatory increased wall function of normal segments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tetsuya Sato (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: