Why the study?
Do different classes of calcium antagonists have distinct therapeutic effects in various cardiovascular conditions?
Do different classes of calcium antagonists have distinct therapeutic effects in various cardiovascular conditions?
This review emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the three classes of calcium antagonists due to their differing pharmacological properties and therapeutic effects in various cardiovascular conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emphasizes class-specific calcium antagonist selection in cardiovascular care; leaves open need for comparative outcome trials.
The safety of calcium antagonists has recently become a controversial issue among cardiologists. Thus, the role of calcium antagonists in the treatment of myocardial infarction and in secondary cardiovascular prevention is under review. As a consequence, the concept that the words 'calcium antagonists' comprise various drug classes has re-emerged. These differ in basic pharmacological properties, tissue selectivity, pharmacokinetics, and final haemodynamic effect. Obviously, such differences alter their therapeutic effect. In this article, the major differences among the three classes of calcium antagonists, phenylalkylamines, dihydropyridines and benzothiazepines, are discussed and reviewed. A comparative analysis of available clinical trials focusing on the usefulness of each drug class is provided for the reader's interest. Some particularly relevant pathological conditions are considered: chronic stable angina pectoris, vasospastic angina, unstable angina pectoris with threatened myocardial infarction, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberto Ferrari (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: