Why the study?
Does docosahexaenoic acid + eicosapentaenoic acid improve heart rate and heart rate variability responses to myocardial ischemia or submaximal exercise in dogs with healed myocardial infarction?
Does docosahexaenoic acid + eicosapentaenoic acid improve heart rate and heart rate variability responses to myocardial ischemia or submaximal exercise in dogs with healed myocardial infarction?
Dietary n-3 PUFAs improve resting autonomic tone in a canine model of healed MI but do not alter cardiac autonomic responses during acute ischemia or exercise.
n-3 PUFAs may enhance resting autonomic tone post-MI in dogs; leaves open effects on ischemia or exercise responses in patients.
The consumption of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) has been reported to decrease resting heart rate (HR) and increase heart rate variability (HRV). However, the effects of n-3 PUFAs on these variables in response to a physiological stress (e.g., exercise or acute myocardial ischemia), particularly in postmyocardial infarction (MI) patients, are unknown. Therefore, HR and HRV (high frequency and total R-R interval variability) were evaluated at rest, during submaximal exercise, and during a 2-min coronary artery occlusion at rest and before and 3 mo after n-3 PUFA treatment in dogs with healed MI (n = 59). The dogs were randomly assigned to either placebo (1 g/day corn oil, n = 19) or n-3 PUFA supplement (docosahexaenoic acid + eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl esters; 1 g/day, n = 6; 2 g/day, n = 12; or 4 g/day, n = 22) groups. The treatment elicited significant (P < 0.01) dose-dependent increases in right atrial n-3 PUFA levels but dose-independent reductions in resting HR and increases in resting HRV. In contrast, n-3 PUFAs did not attenuate the large changes in HR or HRV induced by either the coronary occlusion or submaximal exercise. These data demonstrate that dietary n-3 PUFA decreased resting (i.e., preexercise or preocclusion) HR and increased resting HRV but did not alter the cardiac response to physiologic challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Billman et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: