Why the study?
Does the combination of 123I-BMIPP and 99mTc-TF SPECT imaging accurately predict functional improvement of ischemic myocardium in patients with large AMI compared to 18F-FDG PET combinations?
Does the combination of 123I-BMIPP and 99mTc-TF SPECT imaging accurately predict functional improvement of ischemic myocardium in patients with large AMI compared to 18F-FDG PET combinations?
The combination of 123I-BMIPP and 99mTc-TF SPECT imaging is a practical modality with 70% accuracy for predicting functional improvement of ischemic myocardium after large AMI, comparable to 18F-FDG PET combinations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports 123I-BMIPP/99mTc-TF SPECT as a practical viability option post-AMI; leaves open prospective outcome trials versus PET.
BACKGROUND: (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) is assumed to be the most useful method of evaluating the viability of the myocardium, but its use is limited by the need for a cyclotron. In the present study, the ability of a combination of (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin (TF) and (123)I-beta-methyliodophenyl pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), a combination of (18)F-FDG PET and (123)I-BMIPP SPECT, and a combination of (18)F-FDG PET and (99m)Tc-TF SPECT were compared to predict functional improvement of ischemic myocardium after a large acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with large AMI were studied by (99m)Tc-TF SPECT, (123)I-BMIPP SPECT and (18)F-FDG PET within 3 weeks. Six months later, (99m)Tc-TF imaging was performed. All patients underwent successful revascularization, and had no restenosis. Regional tracer uptake was scored using a 4-point scale in 20 segments of the SPECT and PET images. When the defect score of (123)I-BMIPP SPECT exceeded the defect score of (99m)Tc-TF SPECT or (18)F-FDG PET by 1 point or more, and when the defect score of (99m)Tc-TF SPECT exceeded the defect score of (18)F-FDG PET by 1 point or more, the segment was considered to show mismatching. When the defect score was the same in 2 tracers, the segment was considered to show matching. (99m)Tc-TF imaging at 3 weeks and 6 months used quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) to score wall motion using a 6-point scale (-1= dyskinesis, 0= akinesis, 1= severe hypokinesis, 2= moderate hypokinesis, 3= mild hypokinesis, and 4= normokinesis). The sensitivity of the combination of (123)I-BMIPP and (99m)Tc-TF imaging in predicting functional improvement was 61%, that of (18)F-FDG PET and (123)I-BMIPP SPECT was 94%, and that of (18)F-FDG PET and (99m)Tc-TF SPECT was 76%. The specificity of the combination of (123)I-BMIPP and (99m)Tc-TF imaging in predicting functional improvement was 83%, that of (18)F-FDG PET and (123)I-BMIPP SPECT was 40%, and that of (18)F-FDG PET and (99m)Tc-TF SPECT was 49%. The accuracy of the combination of (123)I-BMIPP and (99m)Tc-TF imaging in predicting functional improvement was 70%, that of (18)F-FDG PET and (123)I-BMIPP SPECT was 71%, and that of (18)F-FDG PET and (99m)Tc-TF SPECT was 63%. CONCLUSION: The combination of (123)I-BMIPP and (99m)Tc-TF imaging is a practical modality for predicting the functional improvement of ischemic myocardium after a large AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seki et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: