Why the study?
The bioactivation mechanism of nitroglycerin has been controversial, and whether ALDH-2 is the key enzyme across therapeutically relevant concentrations remains to be clarified.
Does the ALDH-2 Glu504Lys polymorphism affect forearm blood flow responses to nitroglycerin infusion?
Does the ALDH-2 Glu504Lys polymorphism affect forearm blood flow responses to nitroglycerin infusion?
The ALDH-2 Glu504Lys polymorphism does not alter forearm blood flow responses to nitroglycerin, suggesting ALDH-2 is not solely responsible for its bioactivation in humans.
No genotype-specific nitroglycerin dosing is supported; leaves open whether ALDH-2 is the dominant bioactivation pathway.
The mechanism of the bioactivation of nitroglycerin has long been controversial, with a number of suggested enzymatic pathways. More recently, aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH-2) has been reported as the important enzyme involved in the bioactivation of nitroglycerin at therapeutically relevant concentrations. Other previously described enzyme systems can also bioactivate nitroglycerin, but only at concentrations, which are significantly higher than achieved in clinical practice. This study investigated the vascular response to nitroglycerin given over a wide range of concentrations in subjects with and without the ALDH-2 Glu504Lys polymorphism, a common genetic variant that greatly reduces the activity of ALDH-2 (n = 10 in both groups). Forearm blood flow (FBF) responses to a brachial artery infusion of nitroglycerin were assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography. Intra-arterial infusion of nitroglycerin caused a significant increase in FBF beginning at 0.464 µg/min with increasing responses seen in both groups at all infusion rates. However, there were no differences in the FBF responses to nitroglycerin in those with and without the ALDH-2 polymorphism, suggesting that ALDH-2 is not solely responsible for the bioactivation of nitroglycerin at either low (therapeutically relevant) or high concentrations of nitroglycerin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: