Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreJournal ClubResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeJournal ClubExplore
April 9, 2019European Journal of Preventive CardiologyOpen Access

Impact of a cardiovascular disease risk screening result on preventive behaviour in asymptomatic participants of the ROBINSCA trial

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Receiving a cardiovascular disease screening result may serve as a teachable moment for preventive behavioural change in asymptomatic individuals.

Does receiving an increased coronary artery calcification score result improve prevention-seeking behavior and medication compliance compared to an increased traditional risk score in asymptomatic individuals?

Population

438 respondents from a random sample of 600 ROBINSCA participants

Comparison

Coronary artery calcification screening vs traditional risk assessment

Design

Survey study nested within a randomized trial

Authors

SDSabine J A M DenissenCACarlijn M. van der AalstMVMarleen Vonder

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support greater preventive actions with CAC scoring; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.

Structured PICO

Does receiving an increased coronary artery calcification score result improve prevention-seeking behavior and medication compliance compared to an increased traditional risk score in asymptomatic individuals?

P
Population
438 asymptomatic Dutch individuals (respondents from a random sample of 600 ROBINSCA trial participants), mean age 63.8 ± 6.9 years, 63.5% men.
I
Intervention
Receiving a screening result based on coronary artery calcification score (Agatston ≥ 100)
C
Comparator
Receiving a screening result based on traditional risk assessment (risk > 10%)
O
Outcome
Prevention-seeking behavior (consulting a general practitioner) and compliance with preventive treatmentpatient reported

Receiving an increased coronary artery calcification score leads to significantly higher rates of general practitioner consultation and preventive medication use compared to traditional risk assessment.

Cite This Study

Denissen et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19a5d660e90a7f5fea807ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319843396
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reasons for (non)compliance with intervention following identification of 'high-risk' status in the NHS Health Check programme2014 · 30 citations
  2. 2Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project2003 · 5,352 citations
  3. 3The importance of cholesterol medication adherence: the need for behavioral change intervention programs2018 · 22 citations
  4. 4Does Knowledge of Coronary Artery Calcium Affect Cardiovascular Risk Perception, Likelihood of Taking Action, and Health-Promoting Behavior Change?2014 · 44 citations
  5. 5General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care2008 · 7,616 citations