Why the study?
Does combining the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) with real-time cardiac MRI allow detailed assessment of the cardiovascular mental stress response in healthy volunteers?
Does combining the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) with real-time cardiac MRI allow detailed assessment of the cardiovascular mental stress response in healthy volunteers?
Combining the Montreal Imaging Stress Task with real-time cardiac MRI allows detailed assessment of stress physiology, revealing age- and sex-specific cardiovascular responses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables noninvasive probing of mental stress hemodynamics in healthy adults; leaves open generalizability and clinical relevance pending prospective studies.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate that combining the Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) with real-time cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows detailed assessment of the cardiovascular mental stress response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 healthy volunteers (1:1 M:F, 26-64 years) underwent MRI during rest and the MIST. Real-time spiral phase contrast MR, accelerated with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) was used to assess stroke volume (SV), and radial k-t SENSE was used to assess ventricular volumes. Simultaneous heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) measures allowed calculation of cardiac output (CO), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and arterial compliance (TAC). Endocrine responses were assessed using salivary cortisol. RESULTS: In response to stress, BP increased due to increased CO and reduced TAC but not increased SVR, which fell. HR, not SV, determined CO increases. Greater BP responses occurred in men due to greater CO increases and relatively higher SVR. Older participants had greater BP responses due to greater falls in TAC. Greater cortisol response was correlated with greater falls in TAC but resting cortisol and TAC were not related. CONCLUSION: This new approach allows detailed, accurate assessment of stress physiology. Preliminary findings suggest stress exposes relationships, not seen at rest, of cardiovascular function with age, sex, and endocrine function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: