Why the study?
Does prolonged P wave duration predict stroke mortality in type 2 diabetic patients with prevalent non-major macrovascular disease?
Does prolonged P wave duration predict stroke mortality in type 2 diabetic patients with prevalent non-major macrovascular disease?
Prolonged P wave duration (≥ 114 ms) is an independent predictor of long-term stroke mortality in middle-aged type 2 diabetes patients with prevalent non-major macrovascular disease.
Should not yet change practice in type 2 diabetes; hypothesis-generating for P wave duration as stroke mortality marker in PNMMVD.
BACKGROUND: Prolonged P wave duration is a marker of delayed inter-atrial conduction which may predict cardiovascular disease (CVD). Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for all atherosclerotic manifestations including stroke. We evaluated the prognostic significance of prolonged P wave duration among middle-aged Finnish type 2 diabetes patients with and without prevalent non-major macrovascular disease (PNMMVD) with respect to total and stroke mortality. METHODS: We followed up for 18 years 739 type 2 diabetic patients without previous major CVD event at baseline. Participants were stratified according to P wave duration (<114 or ≥ 114 ms) and PNMMVD (i.e. coronary heart disease defined as ischaemic ECG changes and typical symptoms of angina pectoris, or claudication; yes or no). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the joint association between P wave duration, PNMMVD and the mortality risk. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 509 patients died, and 59 of them died from stroke. Those who had prolonged P wave duration had 2.45 (95% confidence interval: 1.11-5.37) increased stroke mortality among PNMMVD patients. In patients without PNMMVD, there was no relationship between P wave duration and stroke mortality. CONCLUSIONS: As an easily measurable factor P wave duration merits further studies with higher number of patients to evaluate its importance in the estimation of stroke risk in type 2 diabetic patients with PNMMVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vepsäläinen et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: