Why the study?
How does Thallium-201 scintigraphy compare with electrocardiography and angiography for diagnosing and localizing old myocardial infarction?
How does Thallium-201 scintigraphy compare with electrocardiography and angiography for diagnosing and localizing old myocardial infarction?
Thallium-201 scintigraphy is more precise than ECG for localizing old myocardial infarctions and correlates well with wall motion abnormalities, though it cannot determine coronary disease severity.
May aid infarct localization when ECG is inconclusive; leaves open its role versus modern imaging in prospective studies.
Myocardial scintigraphy with 201Tl was performed at rest in a selected group of 36 patients with unequivocal clinical and electrocardiographic evidence of old myocardial infarction. The scintigraphic findings were correlated with electrocardiographic pattern, and with regional left ventricular wall motion and the severity of coronary artery disease defined by contrast angiography. Detection was dependent on the extent of the infarct but was independent of QRS morphology and of the severity of coronary disease. When positive, 201Tl scintigraphy was often a more precise method than the electrocardiogram for localising and delineating the extent of the infarct. Furthermore, the perfusion defect corresponded in location and extent to abnormalities of left ventricular wall motion. The site or severity of coronary artery disease could not be determined from the 201Tl scintigram.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uthurralt et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: