Key result
In dogs with pacing-induced heart failure, levosimendan increased basal end-systolic elastance by 27% and improved LV-arterial coupling by 34%, restoring the positive force-frequency relation.
Why the study?
Does levosimendan improve the force-frequency relation and LV-arterial coupling in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure?
Does levosimendan improve the force-frequency relation and LV-arterial coupling in a canine model of pacing-induced heart failure?
Levosimendan restores the normal positive LV systolic and diastolic force-frequency relation and prevents tachycardia-induced adverse effects on LV-arterial coupling and mechanical efficiency in a canine heart failure model.
Does not inform clinical practice; leaves open translation of levosimendan effects on LV coupling from canine models to humans.
Frequency potentiation of contractile function is a major mechanism of the increase in myocardial performance during exercise. In heart failure (HF), this positive force-frequency relation is impaired, and the abnormal left ventricular (LV)-arterial coupling is exacerbated by tachycardia. A myofilament Ca(2+) sensitizer, levosimendan, has been shown to improve exercise tolerance in HF. This may be due to its beneficial actions on the force-frequency relation and LV-arterial coupling (end-systolic elastance/arterial elastance, E(ES)/E(A)). We assessed the effects of therapeutic doses of levosimendan on the force-frequency relation and E(ES)/E(A) in nine conscious dogs after pacing-induced HF using pressure-volume analysis. Before HF, pacing tachycardia increased E(ES), shortened τ, and did not impair E(ES)/E(A) and mechanical efficiency (stroke work/pressure-volume area, SW/PVA). In contrast, after HF, pacing at 140, 160, 180, and 200 beat/min (bpm) produced smaller a increase of E(ES) or less shortening of τ, whereas E(ES)/E(A) (from 0.56 at baseline to 0.42 at 200 bpm) and SW/PVA (from 0.52 at baseline to 0.43 at 200 bpm) progressively decreased. With levosimendan, basal E(ES) increased 27% (6.2 mmHg/ml), τ decreased 11% (40.8 ms), E(ES)/E(A) increased 34% (0.75), and SW/PVA improved by 15% (0.60). During tachycardia, E(ES) further increased by 23%, 37%, 68%, and 89%; τ decreased by 9%, 12%, 15%, and 17%; and E(ES)/E(A) was augmented by 11%, 16%, 31%, and 33%, incrementally, with pacing rate. SW/PVA was improved (0.61 to 0.64). In conclusion, in HF, treatment with levosimendan restores the normal positive LV systolic and diastolic force-frequency relation and prevents tachycardia-induced adverse effect on LV-arterial coupling and mechanical efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masutani et al. (2011) studied Heart failure (n=9). Levosimendan vs. Baseline (pre-treatment heart failure state) was evaluated on Force-frequency relation and LV-arterial coupling (E(ES)/E(A)). In dogs with pacing-induced heart failure, levosimendan increased basal end-systolic elastance by 27% and improved LV-arterial coupling by 34%, restoring the positive force-frequency relation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: