Key result
Esophageal confinement during atrial fibrillation ablation was associated with higher peak luminal temperatures (36.9°C vs 36.2°C) and increased atrioesophageal fistula risk (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.2).
Why the study?
Recognizing and preventing esophageal injury during catheter ablation for AF remains challenging, and whether esophageal course impacts esophageal heating and injury risk was unclear.
Does esophageal confinement increase esophageal luminal temperatures and the risk of atrioesophageal fistula in patients undergoing first-time AF ablation?
Cohort (n=68)
No
Does esophageal confinement increase esophageal luminal temperatures and the risk of atrioesophageal fistula in patients undergoing first-time AF ablation?
Effect estimate: OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.2-6.2)
p-value: p=<0.01
Esophageal confinement, identified on preprocedural CT, is associated with higher peak esophageal luminal temperatures during AF ablation and may increase the risk of atrioesophageal fistula.
Esophageal confinement may warrant preprocedural CT caution during AF ablation; leaves open whether targeted strategies reduce atrioesophageal fistula risk.
BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), ability to recognize and prevent esophageal injury remains challenging. We hypothesized that esophageal course may impact esophageal heating, as measured through ablation, and thereby, risk of injury. METHODS: We evaluated all patients undergoing first-time AF ablation with preprocedural computed tomography (CT) imaging from 2014 to 2016 at our institution, focusing on esophageal position at the left atrial (LA)/pulmonary vein junction. Esophageal luminal temperatures (ELTs) were analyzed by esophageal course. In exploratory work by investigation of published reports of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF), we evaluated for a relationship between esophageal course and risk of AEF. RESULTS: Of 68 patients, 48.5% had midline, 36.8% leftward, and 14.7% rightward esophageal positions. Of 20 patients (29% of cohort) with esophageal confinement-defined as a midline or leftward position relative to the LA, vertebrae, and aorta, with luminal distortion-14 had leftward position. No significant differences in patient or procedure characteristics were noted between confinement and nonconfinement cohorts. The average peak ELT was significantly higher in those with confinement (36.9°C vs 36.2°C, P < 0.05) and confinement with a left-sided esophagus (37.1°C vs 36.2°C, P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between esophageal confinement and risk of AEF (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-6.2, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients undergoing AF ablation display leftward esophageal course along the ablation zone on preprocedure CT imaging, with a significant portion exhibiting esophageal confinement. In those with confinement, higher peak ELTs are noted with ablation. Esophageal confinement may be a risk factor for development of AEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandhu et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=68). Esophageal confinement vs. No esophageal confinement was evaluated on Risk of atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.2, p=<0.01). Esophageal confinement during atrial fibrillation ablation was associated with higher peak luminal temperatures (36.9°C vs 36.2°C) and increased atrioesophageal fistula risk (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: