Key result
Esophageal temperature and position during atrial fibrillation ablation correlated with endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (2.3% overall incidence; P<.001), but not arrhythmia recurrences.
Why the study?
Thermolesions represent a dangerous complication of AF ablation, and the reasons for thermolesions as well as the effect of esophageal position on rhythm recurrences required evaluation.
Does esophageal position and temperature affect the incidence of esophageal lesions and arrhythmia recurrences in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Observational (n=645)
No
Does esophageal position and temperature affect the incidence of esophageal lesions and arrhythmia recurrences in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Esophageal position and intraluminal temperature during atrial fibrillation ablation correlate with the risk of esophageal thermal lesions but do not impact arrhythmia recurrences.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Esophageal monitoring may flag lesion risk during AF ablation; leaves open whether position- or temperature-guided strategies reduce injury.
BACKGROUND: Thermolesions are a dangerous complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to assess the reasons for thermolesions and the effect of esophageal position on recurrences. METHODS: The study included consecutive patients undergoing AF catheter ablation at Heart Center Leipzig between January and September 2014. We collected data of esophagus localization, temperature, endoscopy, and follow-up. RESULTS: The study included 645 patients into analyses. A total of 626 (97.2%) received a temperature probe. Esophageal position was categorized: (A) behind left pulmonary veins, (B) left ostial, (C) in the middle of left atrium, (D) right ostial, and (E) behind right pulmonary veins. The most frequent esophageal position was B-C (n = 201, 32.1%), followed by B (n = 161, 25.7%), and C (n = 147, 23.5%). The temperature was highest in A-B positions (42.04°C) and in D-E positions (41.70°C). There was a significant correlation between the endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) and the esophageal position (r² = -.115, P = .004) and the esophageal temperature (r² = .162, P = .000), but not with body mass index (BMI) (r² = -.016, P = .688). Additional substrate modification in the left atrium resulted in significantly higher esophageal temperatures (P < .001) and more frequent EDEL (P = .049). An EDEL was found in 15 patients (2.3% of all patients, 5.6% of patients receiving endoscopy). Of those, the median esophageal temperature was 41.8°C (interquartile range [IQR]: 41.2-42.4). Neither esophageal position nor temperature during ablation was associated with arrhythmia recurrences (both P > .400). CONCLUSIONS: EDEL depended on the esophageal position and temperature, but not on BMI. Esophageal position and intraluminal temperature during ablation had no effect on recurrences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stauber et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=645). Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation was evaluated on Endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (EDEL) (p=.000). Esophageal temperature and position during atrial fibrillation ablation correlated with endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (2.3% overall incidence; P<.001), but not arrhythmia recurrences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: