Why the study?
Esophageal injury during AF ablation is a life-threatening complication, prompting investigation into how RF electrode impedance, contact force, and distance from the esophagus associate with esophageal temperature attenuation.
Do lesion distance from the esophagus and baseline impedance affect esophageal luminal temperature rise during atrial fibrillation ablation?
Do lesion distance from the esophagus and baseline impedance affect esophageal luminal temperature rise during atrial fibrillation ablation?
During AF ablation, shorter lesion distance from the esophagus and lower baseline impedance are associated with greater esophageal luminal temperature rises, suggesting that selecting sites with higher baseline impedance near the esophagus may improve safety.
Supports esophageal monitoring near low-impedance sites; leaves open prospective trials of impedance-guided lesion selection.
INTRODUCTION: Esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a life-threatening complication. We sought to measure the association of esophageal temperature attenuation with radiofrequency (RF) electrode impedance, contact force, and distance from the esophagus. METHODS: The retrospective study cohort included 35 patients with mean age 64 ± 10 years, of whom 74.3% were male, and 40% had persistent AF. All patients had undergone preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) followed by AF ablation with luminal esophageal temperature monitoring. Lesion locations were co-registered with CMR image segmentations of left atrial and esophageal anatomy. Luminal esophageal temperature, time matched RF lesion data, and ablation distance from the nearest esophageal location were collected as panel data. RESULTS: Luminal esophageal temperature changes corresponding to 3667 distinct lesions, delivered with mean power 27.9 ± 5.5 W over a mean duration of 22.2 ± 10.5 s were analyzed. In multivariable analyses, clustered per patient, examining posterior wall lesions only, and adjusted for lesion power and duration as set by the operator, lesion distance from the esophagus (-0.003°C/mm, p < .001), and baseline impedance (-0.015°C/Ω, p < .001) were associated with changes in luminal esophageal temperature. CONCLUSION: Esophageal luminal temperature rises are associated with shorter lesion distance from esophagus and lower baseline impedance during RF lesion delivery. When procedural strategy requires RF delivery near the esophagus, selection of sites with higher baseline impedance may improve safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khoshknab et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: