Key result
Doppler-derived dP/dt shows no correlation with aVTI across pacing configurations during CRT optimization.
Why the study?
Suboptimal response to CRT may be improved by echocardiographic optimization of device parameters, but whether Doppler-derived dP/dt correlates with aVTI during optimization required evaluation.
Does Doppler-derived dP/dt correlate with aortic velocity-time integral during cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization in patients with CRT?
Observational (n=46)
Does Doppler-derived dP/dt correlate with aortic velocity-time integral during cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization in patients with CRT?
Doppler-derived dP/dt and aVTI do not correlate during CRT optimization, although both parameters demonstrate the positive effect of biventricular pacing on contractile synchronization.
No correlation between dP/dt and aVTI during CRT optimization; leaves open optimal parameter selection for device programming.
Suboptimal response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be improved by optimization of device parameters using echocardiography. For this purpose, the aortic velocity-time integral (aVTI) was used as a target metric to define optimal velocity timings for each ventricle. dP/dt is a parameter used for the assessment of myocardial contractility. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Doppler-derived dP/dt in optimization by assessing the possible correlation between aVTI and dP/dt. Patients with CRT admitted for routine follow-up were included in the study. Aortic VTI and dP/dt measurements were recorded in four different standard pacing configurations during reprogramming. A total of 46 patients were included in the final analysis. No correlation was found between the aVTI and the delta dP/dt value in the two configurations where the change in dP/dt was maximum (p=0.894). In the two configurations where the change in aVTI was maximum, there was also no correlation between the delta dP/dt and the delta aVTI (p=0.715). When patients were dichotomized according to the median value of dP/dt, there were no differences in aVTI, NYHA classes, LVEF, and mitral regurgitation (MR) severity (p=0.4; p=0.5; p=0.7; p=0.3; respectively). The change in both dP/dt and aVTI was statistically significant when switching from RV-only to QRS width-targeted configuration (p=0.001; p=0.041; respectively). In conclusion, aVTI recorded at different pacing configurations was not correlated with dP/dt during interventricular optimization. However, both parameters consistently showed a positive effect of biventricular pacing on contractile synchronization and stroke volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekinci et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n=46). Echocardiographic optimization of pacing configurations was evaluated on Correlation between aortic velocity-time integral (aVTI) and delta dP/dt (p=0.894). Doppler-derived dP/dt showed no significant correlation with aortic velocity-time integral during cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization across different pacing configurations (p=0.894).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: