Key result
The proportion of percutaneous coronary intervention discharges from low-volume hospitals increased from 5.4% in 2010 to 11.0% in 2018 across all sociodemographic groups.
Why the study?
Trends in the likelihood of receiving PCI at low-volume centers were not well-documented, and whether sociodemographic factors influenced this risk was unknown.
Does the likelihood of receiving PCI at a low-volume hospital vary by sociodemographic factors over time in hospitalized patients?
Cohort (n=374,066)
Yes
Does the likelihood of receiving PCI at a low-volume hospital vary by sociodemographic factors over time in hospitalized patients?
The likelihood of receiving PCI at low-volume hospitals has increased over time across all sociodemographic groups, with widening disparities for racial minorities and low-income patients.
Rising low-volume PCI may affect outcomes; leaves open whether widening disparities worsen risks for minorities and low-income patients.
INTRODUCTION: Over the past two decades, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) capacity has increased while coronary artery disease has decreased, potentially lowering per-hospital PCI volumes, which is associated with less favorable patient outcomes. Trends in the likelihood of receiving PCI in a low-volume center have not been well-documented, and it is unknown whether certain socioeconomic factors are associated with a greater risk of PCI in a low-volume facility. Our study aims to determine the likelihood of being treated in a low-volume PCI center over time and if this likelihood differs by sociodemographic factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 374,066 hospitalized patients in California receiving PCI from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. Our primary outcome was the likelihood of PCI discharges at a low-volume hospital (<150 PCI/year), and secondary outcomes included whether this likelihood varied across different sociodemographic groups and across low-volume hospitals stratified by high or low ZIP code median income. RESULTS: The proportion of PCI discharges from low-volume hospitals increased from 5.4% to 11.0% over the study period. Patients of all sociodemographic groups considered were more likely to visit low-volume hospitals over time (P<0.001). Latinx patients were more likely to receive PCI at a low-volume hospital compared with non-Latinx White in 2010 with a 166% higher gap in 2018 (unadjusted proportions). The gaps in relative risk (RR) between Black, Latinx and Asian patients versus non-Latinx white increased over time, whereas the gap between private versus public/no insurance, and high versus low income decreased (interaction P<0.001). In low-income ZIP codes, patients with Medicaid were less likely to visit low-volume hospitals than patients with private insurance in 2010; however, this gap reversed and increased by 500% in 2018. Patients with low income were more likely to receive PCI at low-volume hospitals relative to patients with high income in all study years. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of receiving PCI at low-volume hospitals has increased across all race/ethnicity, insurance, and income groups over time; however, this increase has not occurred evenly across all sociodemographic groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous coronary intervention (n=374,066). Time (2010 to 2018) vs. Baseline (2010) was evaluated on Likelihood of PCI discharges at a low-volume hospital (<150 PCI/year) (p=<0.001). The proportion of percutaneous coronary intervention discharges from low-volume hospitals increased from 5.4% in 2010 to 11.0% in 2018 across all sociodemographic groups.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: