Key result
Mobile-application-based interventions reduced blood pressure in 5 of 7 studies, decreased BMI in 2 of 3 studies, and improved medication adherence in 5 of 7 studies.
Why the study?
Hypertension and ischemic heart disease are major causes of adult mortality requiring long-term management, and the proliferation of smartphones has spawned numerous mobile-application-based interventions.
Do mobile-application-based interventions improve physiological, behavioral, and psychological outcomes in patients with hypertension and ischemic heart disease?
Systematic Review (n=17)
Do mobile-application-based interventions improve physiological, behavioral, and psychological outcomes in patients with hypertension and ischemic heart disease?
Mobile-application-based interventions show potential for reducing blood pressure and improving medication adherence in patients with hypertension and ischemic heart disease, though evidence remains limited.
May support mobile apps for BP control and adherence in hypertension; leaves open definitive efficacy in ischemic heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension and ischemic heart disease are major causes of adult mortality. Related interventions to manage these conditions are important to implement during long, symptom-free periods. The recent proliferation of smartphones has spawned numerous health interventions that rely on mobile applications. PURPOSE: This systematic review was designed to summarize and analyze research on interventions using mobile applications for patients with hypertension and ischemic heart disease. METHODS: We searched for related studies published from January 2006 to August 2017 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and three Korean databases. Seventeen studies were identified and evaluated against eligibility criteria that included a focus on patients with hypertension or ischemic heart disease and a discussion of the detailed effects of a mobile-app-based intervention. All of the identified studies were evaluated qualitatively using a methodology checklist. RESULTS: Twelve of the 17 studies were deemed as of acceptable quality according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network quality assessment. According to the National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool, one article was of fair quality and four articles were of poor quality. Monitoring, education, and reminders were identified as application interventions. The effects of the app interventions were analyzed according to physiological factors, cognitive and behavioral factors, and psychological factors. Of the seven studies that measured blood pressure in patients with hypertension, five studies reported that the app-based interventions reduced blood pressure. Two of three studies showed a significant decrease of body mass index in patients with ischemic heart disease after the app-based interventions compared to the control group. Five of seven studies reported a significant change in medication adherence. Several studies showed different outcomes according to the disease, but the limited number of eligible studies was insufficient to demonstrate a conclusive effect. CONCLUSIONS: To ensure the long-term effects of mobile-application-based interventions, healthcare professionals should consider the functions of mobile applications. Moreover, because the focus of these interventions may differ based on the nature of the disease, it is recommended that the composition of interventions be tailored to the specific disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Hypertension and ischemic heart disease (n=17). Mobile-application-based interventions vs. Control group was evaluated on Physiological, cognitive, behavioral, and psychological factors (including blood pressure, body mass index, and medication adherence). Mobile-application-based interventions reduced blood pressure in 5 of 7 studies, decreased BMI in 2 of 3 studies, and improved medication adherence in 5 of 7 studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: